|
|
Post by The Commish on Sept 4, 2009 4:45:16 GMT 5
Rays will be back for 2010. I would like to add 2 teams for next year. We contracted 4 in 09, I would like to get the league more active and adding to it might help.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dodgers GM (Jon) on Sept 4, 2009 4:49:10 GMT 5
Dodgers will be back in 2010 and look forward to LOTS of trading. All prospects must go.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigers GM (Ken) on Sept 4, 2009 6:30:04 GMT 5
"The Champ is here!" and planning to return.
What are your ideas on filling the rosters of the new teams? Just FA, expansion draft? And if it's expantion draft, who can be drafted? (I already don't like the sound of that.)
|
|
|
|
Post by The Commish on Sept 4, 2009 8:43:05 GMT 5
"The Champ is here!" and planning to return. What are your ideas on filling the rosters of the new teams? Just FA, expansion draft? And if it's expantion draft, who can be drafted? (I already don't like the sound of that.) I am of the thinking each team puts up 4 players. Details to come later. IDK. I could get a vote later. 3 in 13 to go |
|
|
|
Post by innomm on Sept 4, 2009 19:32:46 GMT 5
i am in. looking to make up for my poor showing this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Eps) on Sept 4, 2009 19:48:41 GMT 5
In
NOT greatly in favor of expansion unless we have all existing teams as hardcore active (and based on log-ins, does not seem to be the case).
That said, I'm not sure I wish to give up 4 players in an expansion quest, either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Jon) on Sept 4, 2009 20:39:53 GMT 5
In for 2010.
I don't really have 4 players I want to get rid of, but whatever the Commish wants to do is fine by me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rays GM (Zach) on Sept 4, 2009 21:13:50 GMT 5
In for 2010. I don't really have 4 players I want to get rid of, but whatever the Commish wants to do is fine by me. it is just an idea to get activity up. we will vote on it, this is a democracy not a DICKtatorship |
|
|
|
Post by prhood on Sept 4, 2009 21:19:23 GMT 5
Seems to me that we've just shaken down to a workable number with 16 teams. Perhaps we should give it another season before thinking about expansion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigers GM (Ken) on Sept 5, 2009 2:00:29 GMT 5
I agree. Maybe we really just focus on getting 16 active members for the upcoming season. And the following year would probably be the best year for it, IF expansion is really something we want to do. There should be more FA then as many of the original contracts from the start of the league were 3 year deals and will be expiring. I don't really think I like the consequences of expansion, but that would seem like a better time for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rays GM (Zach) on Sept 5, 2009 4:41:22 GMT 5
understood
|
|
|
|
Post by Rays GM (Zach) on Sept 8, 2009 4:09:15 GMT 5
reds and Blue Jays are still in. Cutch told me he was probably out.
|
|
|
|
Post by rjbreeze on Sept 8, 2009 20:40:40 GMT 5
A's are in for next year........dont know about expansion yet....more details will help...no hurry
|
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (James) on Sept 8, 2009 21:06:42 GMT 5
Marlins are in for next year.
Definitely thinking that expansion is not a good idea this year. We need to get the 16 teams that we have more active before we start to add more into the mix.
|
|
|
|
Post by prhood on Sept 8, 2009 22:18:08 GMT 5
Padres will be back ... under the same mis-management I hope.
|
|
